Analysis Of Robert Frost s Harry Potter And The Chamber...

J. K. Rowling, a highly appraised author, stated â€Å"It is our choices [†¦] that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities† (Rowling 331) in her best-selling novel â€Å"Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.† The notion that our actions define who we are is one that has been prominent in literature since before Rowling’s novels were even thought of. Specifically, Robert Frost has been implying this conviction in his poems since their creation in the early twentieth century. Additionally, Frost makes clear the idea that certain aspects of humanity influence the decision making process and therefore directly impacting the image of who a person truly is. Acquainted with the Night, The Road Not Taken, and Fire and Ice each reveal Robert Frost’s thoughts on a different aspect of human nature and how these aspects influence the way humans make decisions. Frost s views on the effect of human nature on choice are revealed in the last three lines of Acquainted with the Night: One luminary clock against the sky / Proclaimed the time was neither wrong nor right. / I have been one acquainted with the night (12-14). In this excerpt from the poem, the moon indicates to the speaker that it is not the right or wrong time, implying that it is up to the speaker to decide whether or not to take action. The aspect of human nature that is highlighted in this poem is the tendency of man to wait for a sign or for the time to be right before taking action against the currentShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pagesand permission should be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise. T o obtain permission(s) to use material from this work, please submit a written request to Pearson Education, Inc., Permissions Department, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458, or you may fax your request to 201-236-3290. Many of the designations by manufacturers

Gender Roles And Gender Inequality - 1390 Words

A gender role is defined by the Oxford Dictionary as â€Å"the role or behavior learned by a person as appropriate to their gender, determined by the prevailing cultural norms.† For generations, this confining social construct has dictated how people from both main genders should act and think, keeping them from reaching their full potentials. Though we have made progress over the years, these sexist mindsets are still embedded into the hearts of many today. I am here to point out the negative consequences brought about by gender roles and gender inequality and how they affect mental and emotional health, cause a less accepting world, and prohibit our societies, both western and eastern, from fully advancing. It is often believed that the main victim of gender roles are females, and though this was true for the majority of our history, males are increasingly becoming discriminated against by gender roles as well. Because you are male, you cannot publicly enjoy colors associate d with femininity or else western society sees you as less of a man. Because you are male, you have some unspoken obligation to earn more than your female spouse. And because you are male you are taught from a young age to suppress your feelings. Males are becoming more victimized by gender roles, however that does not in anyway mean that gender roles do not still affect women. Because you are female, you automatically have to take more care of your appearance or society makes you feel unattractive. BecauseShow MoreRelatedGender Roles And Gender Inequality1262 Words   |  6 Pagesthe role of both the male and the female in society. As time passed and civilization progressed, the question of the role of the women has also changed. Men and women in society have had many differences, which included things such as gender roles, gender inequality, inequality in the workforce, and sex discrimination. Also, the questions of what it takes to be a man or to be a woman is very important. Fo r many different cultures, gender differences are extremely important, as well as the role itRead MoreGender Roles And Gender Inequality1576 Words   |  7 Pagesand girls when women already earn less than men in economic spheres (â€Å"Fact Sheet†, 2010). The underlying gender roles and gender inequality that persists in South Africa help not only to explain their unbelievably difficult daily burdens but it also aids in the understanding of the lack of economic and political representation of women in the region (Bentley, 2004). Within South Africa there is a significant gap in the lack of opportunity and representation of women within the economic and politicalRead MoreGender Inequality And Gender Roles1872 Words   |  8 PagesGender inequality is amongst us all in any given society. Although gender is not as simple as may seem. Gender comes into play along with a number of different aspects such as sex, gender and gender roles. Each of these aspects play a significant part when speaking of the different social problems encountered by men and women. Sex makes up the biological differences; of male or female. Gender is the socially learned behaviors that are attached to the sexes (Henslin, p. 322), which create Gender RolesRead MoreGender Inequality And Gender Roles2518 Words   |  11 PagesSOC 100 7/5/2015 ESSAY 1 Gender has dominated the daily lives of many Americans as it has become a preordained law to which everyone has to follow in order to be socially accepted as a normal human being. But over the years, gender has angered the modern generation into a new breed of social activist, that are fighting for the standing principle of equality regardless of sex. Brought by the lingering effects of gender role, and the inequality that accompanies it, gender has created a schism, notRead MoreThe Inequality Of Women And Gender Roles892 Words   |  4 Pagesmost gender discrimination from society the issue of inequality of women and gender roles still lingers within our social institutions. We allow those in higher classes to hold so much privilege that they use their power to enforce social controls in order to place individuals who are devalued into a controlled category of difference. Father Roy Bourgeois was a priest for forty plus years in the Catholic church, believing and preaching his rel igious doctrine that specifically cut out the role of womenRead MoreThe Inequality Between Gender Roles1280 Words   |  6 Pagesover time and how we manage to strongly standby what we belief no matter the circumstances. At a young age I began to recognize the roles between male and female figures in a household. These traditional roles I was familiar with were not satisfying, but overtime I was able to embrace new beliefs about how I wanted a female to be seen as. The inequality between gender roles in society was something I was very intrigued by because it was the first time in my life that I began to fight for something IRead MoreGender Roles, Race, And Inequality1966 Words   |  8 PagesFeminism is the approach to gender roles, race, and inequality in women. It also refers to individuals or organizations that promote changes to society to end the issues involving women. Feminism addresses economic, social, political and cultural differences of power and rights. Sexism plays a huge role in feminism. Generally, people are inferior if they are identified as a black woman and those identified as white women are superior and experience more advantages. Society has formed a culture whereRead MoreThe Role Of Gender Inequality On Young Girls873 Words   |  4 PagesThe Role of Gender Inequality All parents care about equality. Not only for all races, but for all genders as well. Equality is, and will always be the basic foundation of humanity. However, we still see gender inequality on a daily basis negatively affecting not only women, but young girls as well. This is because society uses women to appeal to an audience, and portrays them as being objects. If gender inequality stays a prominent part of the American culture, equality will never be reached. Read MoreGender Roles And Inequality During The 21st Century Essay1425 Words   |  6 PagesIn context of today, gender roles and inequality is controversial and has sparked numerous social debates across the world. However, the role of gender has not just become an issues in the 21st century but in truth has been affecting the lives of men and woman for hundreds of years. During the renaissance when Saint Teresa lived, woman’s role in the functioning of society were often either forgotten or dismissed as their voi ce was significantly less powerful then a man’s say. Woman were often consideredRead MoreGender Roles Equal Inequality A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen536 Words   |  2 Pages Beauty models, movie stars, and music artists have become role models for thousands of people despite submitting to gender roles and stereotypes. Even though some teens may believe that they are immune to the presence of these gender roles, the media, society, their cultural beliefs, and their peers are capable of influencing them into changing their opinions and life choices. An example of this is how Nora is treated like a doll and a child by her husband and blindly accepts the life that society

Expectations and Blindness in King Lear Free Essays

Shakespeare, with his brilliant portrayal of Lear’s conflict with two opposing forces: aesthetics and reality, continues to draw both readers and audiences with Lear’s many meanings and interpretations. The main character, King Lear, is the object of universal identification with his obliviousness as to who people truly are, and the discovery of truth. It is this identification that exceeds the Elizabethan period, making King Lear a play for all times. We will write a custom essay sample on Expectations and Blindness in King Lear or any similar topic only for you Order Now With his world about to be shattered, Lear will realize that the world he was living in as King, is not so nice as it seems. King Lear is the story of how a man â€Å"once obsessed with image and power†(Hamilton 175) is forced to see that those around him are not who he believes they are. The issue of vision and insight, and the absence of it, is a major theme in Lear. This theme is portrayed through the characters of King Lear, Gloucester and Edgar. The lack of insight, or â€Å"blindness†, is very symbolic. Blindness is defined as â€Å"unable to see; lacking the sense of sight;†(Dictionary). For Lear, blindness was not physical; it was his flaw. Lear’s blindness to see who a person really was, based on their character and personality, was obvious at the beginning of the play regarding Cordelia and Kent. Gloucester, on the other hand, was originally blind because he also had a flaw against seeing the truth. He is physically blinded by Cornwall, but after he gains the vision that Lear lacks. Lear’s understanding that vision is not only physical came too late, and is the cause of his downfall. Lear knows absolutely that he is not only a King, but the father of the family unit, the patriarchal figurehead. He believes these titles makes him better than everybody else, that everyone else bows to him. Because of this, he demands high levels of public affection, that he wholly expects to receive. Lear emphasizes his expectations at the start of the play, repeatedly referring to nature and â€Å"offices of nature†(2. 4. 94-202) to which he thinks everyone must listen to because it would be â€Å"unnatural† to ignore them. (2. 4. 320) Lear thinks it is his right for others, especially his family, to bestow pure and unlimited love and devotion on him; it is this belief that causes him to split the Kingdom – which to the Elizabethan audience would be something only crazy people would do. Lear’s oldest daughters, Goneril and Regan, as trained, exa ggerate their feelings by proclaiming their love for their father exceeds all others, and they are rewarded for their expressions â€Å"†¦ ith wealth but with the power to dictate the conditions of public life, the power to make a new kingdom in the shell of the old, to become the new Lears. † (Basney 18) Sharon Hamilton compares Baptista (The Taming of the Shrew) and Lear, explaining their behaviour: â€Å"In both plays, the fathers show preference to the hypocritical daughters and set down, by direct statement and implication, the public role that they want them to play. Both Baptista and Lear flatter themselves on being good fathers, and both see as the test of their effectiveness the daughter’s compliance with her prescribed role. Above all, each man values reputation and status and eschews any word or act that reflects badly on his public image. The shallowness of their outlook is revealed by the presence of a sister who is the†¦. daughter’s temperamental opposite†(Hamilton 93). Lear then turns to Cordelia, and knowing she loves him he demands the same thing: to speak her love for him to recieve a portion of the kingdom. However, unlike her sisters, Cordelia is not going to follow her father’s expectations. Cordelia â€Å"raises the issue of obligation itself in an unprotected†¦.. way. She states the moral framework†(Basney 18) of how she can’t love Lear all forever; her love will be split when she is married – like how her sisters should have been. Of course, Lear is outraged by the thought that his expectations, that Cordelia fawn over him and flaunt her love for him publicly, will not come true. Lear then disowns Cordelia. Kent, having more insight than Lear, is able to see the honest love Cordelia has for Lear. Kent tries to prove to Lear that he is making the wrong choice in disowning his daughter and he is not seeing her love for him. Lear replies angrily with â€Å"Out of my sight! †(1. 1. 179) to which Kent answers, â€Å"See better, Lear, and let me still remain/ The true blank of thine eye. † Lear’s windows to reality, Kent and Cordelia, are banished and for now, Lear alone is able to make his own decisions. Meanwhile, Gloucester is also a victim of blindness. Like Lear, Gloucester can’t see which of his two sons truly love him. Edmund forged the letter that was allegedly written by his brother, saying Edgar is planning to kill Gloucester. His father sees the letter and is instantly convinced. He was made to believe, by his blindness and some help from Edmund, that Edmund loved him and Edgar was the son plotting to kill him. G. Wilson Knight comments on the parallels between the main plot of Lear and Gloucester’s sub-plot: â€Å"The Gloucester-theme is a certain indication of our vision and helps us to understand, and feel the enduring agony of Lear†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ Now all the Lear effects are exaggerated in the Gloucester theme. † (Knight 139) Unlike Lear though, Gloucester is blinded by the Duke of Cornwall; from that moment on, Gloucester’s vision starts clearing up. â€Å"I have no way and therefore want no eyes; I stumbled when I saw†(4. 1. 19-20) is the climax for Gloucester as he can now see the truth. Gloucester realized he was blind to the truth and how he was more blind when he could see physically. He knows now that he doesn’t need his eyes to see and understand because he can understand better in his mind, without the aesthetics, or the outward appearance, to trick him. Eventually, Lear’s strong trust in his expectations eventually spirals down into severe instability and â€Å"madness as he figures out –by the events of the play- that his expectations can’t be achieved. Lear’s downfall caused is because of this fault of his mind, And he knows it: O Lear, Lear, Lear! Beat at this gate that let thy folly in, And thy dear judgement out. (1. 4. 287) Lear now see’s his daughters â€Å"as aspects of his self, now tainted†(Hamilton 118). The insanity he goes through is the punishment for his â€Å"blindness†. Lear was once a master of nature itself, as he believed, as a God; he realizes that he is ‘slave’ to nature in the form of weather. The arduous, painful power of the storm drowns him, in desperate fallacy, and creates a strong nostalgia and the extreme longing for affection. Lear â€Å"see[s] how this world goes† like blinded Gloucester, â€Å"see[s] it feelingly†. (4. 6. 162-4) The blinding of Gloucester was an exaggeration of cruelty, the same horrible cruelty that led Lear to madness. Lear and Gloucester gain sympathy from the audience, adding to the heaviness of the tragedy’s ending. Edgar and Cordelia are the rays of hope in Lear, because even after their fathers have wronged them because of their blindness, the children return to their fathers and â€Å"†¦ put all their efforts into comforting and restoring them†¦. †(Hamilton 174) The irony of Lear and Gloucester’s blindness is made even more sad because Kent, Cordelia and the Fool are aware of their ignorance. These three characters can tell what is going on, but they cannot do anything to fix it. Lear is blind to Cordelia’s honest love for her father, instead embracing Goneril and Regan’s expected proclamations of, what really is false love. As Lear goes mad, he finally see’s what he has done by placing â€Å"roles† on those around him, and see’s the roles his daughters play, that he created, are not who Regan and Goneril truly are. Yet as soon as he realizes his mistake, shredding his blindness, insanity moves in. The Fool and Kent both remain loyal to Lear, always trying to make him see what is really going on. â€Å"Lear is constantly reminding us with convincing representations of obligation, faithfulness, and care, without allowing us to take the kind of comfort from them that we want. † (Basney 27) What Basney means here, is that while Cordelia, the Fool and Kent show their faithfulness in Lear, while Edgar cares for his blind father, Lear and Gloucester are not aware that they have people who care for them and love them unconditionally. The audience wants Gloucester and Lear to see that the most loyal people have never left or betrayed them. However, Kent and Edgar â€Å"must go underground. The disguise of goodness is the principle of Lear’s new kingdom. †(Basney 20) Through Cordelia, the Fool, and Kent, Shakespeare created a connection for the audience to sympathize with, drawing the audience emotionally closer to each character. With every piece of advice disregarded or neglected, a feeling of urgency rises, until the audience can only wish that there is hope somewhere. Everyone see’s what they wish to believe; that is, people’s expectations shape what is actually in front of them, so that they see what they want to see. It’s these factors that makes Lear’s characters so relate-able. G. Wilson Knight expands on this: â€Å"Our vision has thus been uniquely focused to understand that vision of the grotesque, the incongruous, the fantastically horrible, which [was] the agony of Lear’s mind† (Knight 142). We can feel Lear’s pain, we can sympathize with him. This play shows that we need to look beyond what our eyes can see and pay more attention to what is really going on. We must avoid seeing what we should not see, and stop not seeing what we should. We must be able to see blinded and not be blinded by sight. In King Lear those who appear blind have the best vision, those who seem fools are the wisest, and those who don’t speak much really know the most. How to cite Expectations and Blindness in King Lear, Essay examples

Principles Of Commercial Law for Legal Problems - MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Write about thePrinciples Of Commercial Law for Legal Problems. Answer: Introduction: After pursuing the facts of this scenario, the issue arises if Ruth will be successful if she brings claiming negligence against Keith. Ruth is willing to take action againt Keith in negligence. Keith was negligent when instead of using hardwood; he used leftover untreated chipboard to replace the rotten timber trade on the stairs. Therefore, it has to be seen if roads will be successful in establishing that Keith's actions fell below the standard of care. That should have been applied. Analysis: In order to decide the issue in the present case, the principles related with the law of negligence need to be applied. First of all, the term negligence in itself has to be defined. Therefore in the present context, negligence is the action of the person where the person owed a duty of care and due to the breach of this duty; the other person has suffered a loss or injury (Hepple, 1997). Similarly, the relevant statutory provisions have been mentioned in the Civil Liability Act that need to be applied for the purpose of deciding if the person can be held negligible and also the liability of the person that arises as a result of the negligent acts. Under the law of negligence, when one person sues the other in negligence, such person wants to recover financial compensation for the damage. The reason is that in such cases, the person suffering the loss wants that equity he or she should be put in the same position where such person would have been if the negligence of the ot her person would not have taken place. In order to deal with the person if under the circumstances, person as liability in negligence, there are four questions that need to be considered. Hence, for this purpose, it has to be considered if the defendant had a duty of care towards the plaintiff. Another requirement is that the plaintiff should have suffered an injury or loss caused by such breach of duty (Deakin, Johnston and Markesinis, 2003). The injuries suffered by the plaintiff should be directly caused by the breach of duty. In this way, all these factors need to be present so that it can be held that the defendant was liable in negligence. Therefore even if one of these elements is not present, the action brought by the plaintiff to claim compensation could not succeed as in such a case, the liability of the defendant cannot be established. For this purpose, the duty of care has been defined by the law as the legal obligation according to which the defendant should not act in such a way that may result in harm to th e other persons. Such a duty is present when it can be reasonably foreseen that the other person is going to suffer harm if the defendant does not act reasonably carefully (Kujinga, 2009). Another requirement in this regard is that there should be sufficient proximity between the parties so that it can be claimed that the beauty of care was present on part of the defendant. An example of such a relationship can be given in the form of the relationship that exists between doctor and patient or the relationship between drivers of vehicles and other persons the road. The Civil Liability Act has imposed some qualifications on the duty of care, for example good Samaritans and food donors. According to the law, when a person is acting in an emergency situation and without expecting money in return or when a person is providing food for charity, generally such persons are exempt from liability if they were not negligent in their actions. The breach of duty of care: In order to decide if the defendant can be held liable for the breach of duty of care, the court is required to consider the standard of care that applies in a particular case. In this context, the relevant standard of care can be decided by considering what any other reasonable person would have done in the same situation. Hence, if the actions of the defendant can be termed as unreasonable or if these actions were below the standard of care that is applicable in the case, a conclusion can be made that the defendant had breached the duty of care (Tomasic, Bottomley and McQueen, 2002). The breach of duty of care can be claimed by the plaintiff if it can be established that the defendant was aware or ought to be aware of the risk. This factor is also called reasonable foreseeability. In the same way, it is also required for this purpose that the reason should not be unimportant and therefore, precautions would have been taken by any reasonable person in ord er to avoid harm caused by such risk. It is required in such cases that the risk should not be insignificant. This is the amendment that has been made by the Civil Liability Act. The effect of these changes is that the bar related with reasonableness has been raised. Therefore, now it is not only necessary that the harm that has been caused to the plaintiff should be reasonably foreseeable, at the same time it is also necessary that the risk of harm should not be insignificant (Gardiner and McGlone, 1998). But at the same time, it also needs to be mentioned this to the standards are not very clear and therefore the courts give their decision on the basis of the facts of each case. Similarly the precautions that can be reasonably expected to be taken in the case also depend on the facts of each case. As a result, the facts that would have been considered by any other reasonable individual while deciding if precautions should be taken against the risk. Also present in the statute. In this regard, another factor that should be considered is the likely seriousness of harm along with the burden that may be created as a result of taking these precautions to avoid the harm and on the other hand, the likely benefits of the activity as a result of which such harm was created (McDonald, 2005). Reasonable foreseeability: When the court is deciding if knew or ought to know regarding the risks, the principles that have been mentioned by the court in Donaghue v Stevenson (1932) can be applied. The plaintiff in this case had found the remains of a decomposed snail in ginger beer bottle. In this case, the importance of foreseeability of injury has been sufficiently highlighted due to which the plaintiff has suffered a harm on account of the defendant's conduct or the lack of action. Therefore it can be stated that under the Civil Liability Act also, it is necessary that the negligence should be present as a result of which, harm was created. Another requirement is that the harm that has been caused to the claimant needs to be within the scope of defendant's liability. In order to deal with this issue, it needs to be seen if a connection is present between the alleged negligence of the defendant and the harm caused to the plaintiff. But this is a question of fact and as a result, needs to be decided individually in each case. It'll also be stated that causation requires that "but for the defendant's actions, the plaintiff would not have suffered the harm". Consequently, it is also called the 'but-for' tests. However, the civil liability act has changed the words of this test. Now it is mentioned that cause is one of the elements that are necessary for the harm. In this context, a question can be asked under the law if foreseeability can be considered as appropriate to widen the scope of liability of a person who has caused a breach of duty and as a result. The other party has suffered a harm. For this purpose, the law also considers the policy issues that may exist. Hence, it needs to be considered if any reason is present due to which it can be said that the defendant was not liable. Commonwealth v Verwayen [1990] HCA 39 can be considered as an example of a situation where the court was of the opinion that the duty of care has been breached by the Commonwealth. In this case, as a result of negligence the ship sank. Even if it was held that the Commonwealth was responsible for this accident however, action was initiated by the plaintiff for the lung and liver cancer that ensued every smoking and drinking by the plaintiff. All this started after the plaintiff suffered the accident. In the past, this issue has been considered by the courts in terms of remoteness and proximity. An 'intervening cause'is also a relevant factor in this regard. However, the Civil Liability Act deals with this issue in terms of policy reasons. Therefore in such a case it needs to be considered if it will be appropriate if only one party is held responsible for the consequences of a particular event when an intervening factor is also present, for example, the choice made by the person hims elf. In such cases, it has to be seen if the risk was not insignificant. While in most cases, it can be clearly stated that there has been a breach of duty. The Civil Liability Act provides that the relevant standard while finding if a breach of duty has taken place is to see if the risk of harm was not insignificant. But in this regard, it is not clear how much further a not insignificant risk can go beyond reasonable foreseeability. Therefore the courts have to deal with this question by considering the facts of each case. Apologies: the law provides that when a person has made an apology concerning the harm that is alleged to be caused by such a person, the apology cannot be considered as the express or implied admission of liability. In the same way, the law also provides that such apology cannot be considered as relevant while deciding if the person was liable for such matter or not. As a result, when civil proceedings are going on between the parties, evidence regarding apology cannot be considered to be the evidence of the fact that such person is liable. In this context, apology is the expression of sympathy and regret or you can be described as the general feeling of benevolence regardless of the fact that there is any admission of guilt or not. Similarly, it also needs to be considered in this case if there is contributory negligence present in this case. A particular plaintiff can be considered to have contributed the negligence when the plaintiff had also participated in the injuries suffered by it. Consequently, when the claimant had not exercised the required care regarding its own safety, the law provides that in such a case it can be held by the court that the plaintiff had also contributed in negligence. In this case, it can be concluded that Keith was liable for the injuries caused to Ruth. This can be stated due to the reason that Keith did not have the necessary qualifications. Moreover, he had used leftover chipboard where he should have used the hardwood. Therefore, when Ruth was walking downstairs, she could not see that the tread was missing because at that time she was getting several feeding dishes. In this case, it can be said that Ruth can claim compensation from Keith as he has suffered serious injuries as a result of the negligence of Keith. However, the amount that may be awarded by the court as compensation to Ruth can be reduced as a result of the fact that Ruth has also contributed in negligence when she failed to see that the tread was missing. In the same way the apology of Keith cannot be presented as evidence regarding the liability of Keith. References Bob Hepple, (1997) Negligence: The Search for Coherence 50 Current Legal Problems 69 David Gardiner and Frances McGlone, (1998) Outline of Torts (2nd ed,), Butterworths Deakin, S., Johnston A and Markesinis B (2003) Markesinis and Deakin's Tort Law, Oxford University Press Kujinga, Benjamin (2009). "Reasonable Care And Skill The Modern Scope Of The Auditor's Duty". GAA Accounting McDonald, Barbara (2005). "Legislative Intervention in the Law of Negligence: The Common Law, Statutory Interpretation and Tort Reform in Australia". Sydney Law Review. 27 (3) Tomasic, Roman; Bottomley, Stephen; McQueen, Rob (2002) Audits and Auditors, Corporations Law in Australia, Federation Press